Pelvic Stabilization During Resistance Training: Its Effect on the Development of Lumbar Extension Strength
James E. Graves, PhD, Dina C. Webb, MS, PT, Michael L. Pollock, PhD, Jan Matkozich, Scott H. Leggett, MS, David M. Carpenter, MS, Dan N. Foster, MS, Joseph Cirulli
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare resistance exercise training with and without pelvic stabilization on the development of isolated lumbar extension strength. Isometric torque of the isolated lumbar extensor muscles was measured at seven positions through a 72° rangeofmotion on 47 men and 30 women before and after 12 weeks of variable resistance lumbar extension training. Subjects were assigned to either a group that trained with pelvic stabilization (PSTAB, n = 21), a group that trained without pelvic stabilization (NOSTAB, n = 41), or a control group that did not train (n = 15). Subjects trained once a week with 8 to 12 repetitions to volitional exhaustion.
The PSTAB and NOSTAB groups showed significant (p 0.05) and similar increases in the weight load used for training (PSTAB = 24.1 ± 9.4 kg; NOSTAB = 19.4 ± 11.0 kg) during the 12week training period. In contrast, posttraining isometric torque values describing isolated lumbar extension strength improved only for the PSTAB group (23.5%, p 0.05) and not for the NOSTAB group (1.2%, p > 0.05) relative to controls. These data indicate that pelvic stabilization is required to effectively train the lumbar extensor muscles. The increased training load for the NOSTAB group is probably the result of exercising the muscles involved in pelvic rotation (hamstring and buttock muscles).
